…that if you are going to operate JT65, first you learn the proper way to make a JT65 QSO???
Because I'm OCD, I hesitated to make my first JT65 QSO until I understood this. I found this page which was a big help. Scrolling down the page, NW7US suggests that the proper format of a JT65 QSO is something like this (from the linked page):
CQ K1JT FN20 (First station calls CQ)
K1JT W6DTW CM97 (A second station answers CQ w/ grid square)
W6DTW K1JT -18 (CQ station sends signal report)
K1JT W6DTW R-16 (Answering station sends "R" + sig report)
W6DTW K1JT RRR (RRR indicates that the R+signal was received OK)
K1JT W6DTW 73 (RRR was received OK)
W6DTW K1JT 73 (The end of the QSO, K1JT signs '73')
And the thing is, you have little macro buttons to push that handle this for you. JT65-HF-HB9HQX-Edition even lights the next one up for you in blue so you know which one to choose.
So why in the world is someone doing something like
CQ K0xxx EM09 (First station calls CQ)
K0xxx KC9YTJ EM69 (I respond)
KC9YTJ K0xxx R-12 (Whut? Duh? Huh?)
K0xxx KC9YTJ -10 (OK. we'll play it your way — as if I started the QSO)
KC9YTJ K0xxx 73 (Again, wha????? No RRR????)
K0xxx KC9YTJ 73 (Fine, whatever.)
This is not the first time this has happened to me. I don't understand how anyone can take a highly-standardized QSO format like this (it's not a ragchewing mode, people!) and still managed to fuck it up.


OK, so that's weird. I guess I wll have to investigate. Because I'm antenna-poor, I've been running 100 watts, which is probably overdriving the antenna (it's rated at 100 watts, but that and five bucks will get you a latte at Starbucks). W79X said